BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • Allery, L. A., Owen, P. A., & Robling, M. R. (1997). Why general practitioners and consultants change their clinical practice: a critical incident study. BMJ, 314(7084), 870-4.
  • Andersson, B., & Nilsson, S. (1964). Studies in the reliability and validity of the critical incident technique. Journal of Applied Psycholoy, 20, 398-403.
  • Bailey, T. (1956). The critical incident technique in identifying behavioural criteria of professional nursing effectiveness. Nursing Research, 5, 52-64.
  • Baker, P. (1993). The Historical context of auditing and significant event auditing in particular. Paper presented at the National Conference on Significant Event Auditing, Castle Donnington.
  • Baker, R. (1995). Clinical audit in primary care: towards quality assurance. BMJ, 310, 413.
  • Benett, I., & Danczak, A. (1994). Terminal care: improving teamwork in primay care using Significant Event Analysis. European Journal of Cancer Care, 3, 54-57.
  • Berger, A. (1998). Why doesn't audit work. BMJ, 316, 875-6.
  • Berlin, A., Spencer, J., Bhopal, R., & Zwanenberg, T. v. (1992). Audits of deaths in general practice: pilot study of the critical incident technique. Quality in Health Care, 1, 231-235.
  • Bhasdale, A. (1998). The wrong diagnosis: identifying causes of potentially adverse events in general practice using incident monitoring. Family Practice, 15, 308-18.
  • Bhasdale, AL, Miller GC, Reid SE, Britt HC. Analysing potential harm in Australian general practice: an incident-monitoring study. Med J Aust 1998 Jul 20;169(2):73-6
  • Bradley, C. P. (1992). Turning anecdotes into data-the critical incident technique. Family Practice, 9(1), 98-103.
  • Bradley, C. (1992b). Uncomfortable prescribing decisions: a critical incident study. BMJ, 304, 294-6.
  • Brennan , Leape, L., & NLaird. (1991). Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalised patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 324, 370-6.
  • Brigley, S., Young, Y., Littlejohns, P., & McEwen, J. (1997). Continuing education for medical professionals: a reflective model. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 73, 2.3-26.
  • Britt, H. (1997). Collecting data on potentially harmful events: a method on monitoring incidents in general practice. Family Practice, 14, 101-6.
  • Britt H, Miller GC, Steven ID, Howarth GC, Nicholson PA, Bhasdale AL, Norton KJ. Collecting data on potentially harmful events: a method formonitoring incidents in general practice. Family Pract 1997;14(2):101-6
  • Brookfield, S. (1988). Developing Critical Thinkers - Challenging Adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Buckley, G. (1990). Clinically significant events. In M. Marinker (Ed.), Medical Audit in General Practice . London: BMJ.
  • Cantillon, P., & Jones, R. (1999). Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference? BMJ, 318, 1276-1279.
  • Care, W. (1996). Identifying the Learning needs of Nurse Managers: application of the critical incident technique. Journal of Nursing Staff development, 12, 27-30.
  • Cheek, J., O'Brien, B., Ballantyne, A., & Pincombe, J. (1997). Using critical incident technique to inform aged and extended care nursing. West J Nurs Res, 19(5), 667-82.
  • Clamp, C. (1980). Learning through incidents. Nursing Times, 76, 1755-58.
  • Clarke, B., James, C., & Kelly, J. (1996). Reflective practice: reviewing the issues and refocusing the debate. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 33, 171-180.
  • Clark CE. Are  beta -blockers ever safe in asthma? Asthma-in-General-Practice, 2000; 8/1:7-8.
  • CMO. (1998). A Review of continusing Professional Development in General Practice . London: Department of Health.
  • Crandall, S. (1993). How Expert Clinical Educators Teach What They Know. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Profession, 13, 85-98.
  • Crombie, D. L., & Fleming, D. M. (1988). Practice Activity Analysis. London: Royal College of General Practitioners.
  • Crombie, I., & Davis, H. (1990). Missing link in the audit cycle. Quality Health Care, 2, 47-8.
  • Crouch, S. (1991). Critical incident analysis. Nursing, 4(37), 30-1.
  • Curtis, P. (1974). Medical audit in general practice. Journal of the Royal college of General Practitioners, 24, 607-11.
  • Diamond, M. (1995). A critical incident study of general practice trainees in their basic general practice term. The Medical Journal of Australia, 162, 321-324.
  • Dixon, N. (1996). Good practice in clinical audit. A summary of selected literature to support criteria for clinical audit. London: National Centre for Clinical Audit.
  • DoH. (1989). Medical Audit. NHS Review Working Paper 6 . London: HMSO.
  • DoH. (1990). Medical Audit in the Family Practitioner Services. Health Circular (FP) (90)8. . London: HMSO.
  • DoH. (1998). A First Class Service . London: Department of Health.
  • DoH. (1998). A review of continuing professional development in general practice . London: Department of Health.
  • Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44, 166-204.
  • Dunn, W. (1986). The critical incident technique: a brief guide. Medical Teacher, 22, 207-215.
  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327 - 58.
  • Fox M, Sweeney G, Howells C, Stead J. Significant Event Audit in Prison Healthcare: changing a culture for clinical governance - a qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Governance 2001;9:123-8
  • Franks, V., Watts, M., & Fabricus, J. (1994). Interpersonal learning in groups: an investigation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20, 1162-1169.
  • Holmwood, C. (1996). How do general practice registrars learn from their clinical experience? Australian Family Physician, 26, 36-40.
  • Hopkins, A. (1991). Approaches to medical audit. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 45, 1-3.
  • Howe, A. (1998). Can GPs audit their ability to detect psychological distress? One approach and some unresolved issues. British Journal of General Practice, 48, 899-902.
  • Hughes, J., & Humphries, C. (1990). Medical Audit in General Practice: A Practicle Guide to the Literature. London: King Edwards' Hospital Fund for London.
  • Irvine, D. (1990). Standards in general practice: the quality initiative revised. British Journal of General Practice, 40, 75-77.
  • Jones, R. (1992). Getting Better: Education and the health care team. BMJ, 305, 506-508.
  • Lemboke, P. (1967). Evaluation of Medical Audit. JAMA, 199, 543-600.
  • Lichstein, P., & Young, G. (1996). My most meaningful patient: reflective learning on a general medicine service. Journal of General International Medicine, 11, 406-9.
  • Love, C. (1996). Critical incidents and PREP - post registration education and practice. Professional Nurse, 11, 576-7.
  • Lyons, C., & Gumpert, R. (1990). Medical audit data: counting is not enough. BMJ, 300, 1563-6.
  • Marinker, M. (Ed.). (1990). Principles. London: MSD Foundation.
  • Marinker, M. (1990). Standards. In M. Marinker (Ed.), Medical Audit and General Practice . London: The MSD Foundation.
  • Marinker, M. (Ed.). (1992). Clinically Significant Events. London: MSD Foundation.
  • Marshall, C. (1993). Potential learning through critical incident analysis. Br J Theatre Nurs, 3(9), 23-5.
  • Maxwell, R. (1984). Quality assessment in health. BMJ, 288, 1470-2.
  • Minghella, E., & Benson, A. (1995). Developing reflective practice in mental health nursing through critical incident analysis. J Adv Nurs, 21(2), 205-13.
  • Newble, D. (1983). The critical incident technique: a new approach to the asssessment of clincal performance. Medical Education, 22, 401-403.
  • Norman, I., Redfern, S., Thomlin, D., & Oliver, S. (1992). Developing Flanagans' critical incident technique to elicit indicatiors of high and low quality nursing care from patients and their nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 590-600.
  • Orme, L., & Maggs, C. (1993). Decision-making in clinical practice: how do expert nurses, midwives and health visitors make decisions? Nurse Education Today, 13, 270-276.
  • Øvretveit J. A team quality improvement sequence for complex problems. Quality in Health Care 1999;8:239-246)
  • Parker, D. L., Webb, J., & D'Souza, B. (1995). The value of critical incident analysis as an educational tool and its relationship to experiential learning. Nurse EducationToday, 15(2), 111-6.
  • Pendleton, D., Schofield, T., & Marinker, M. (1986). In Persuite of Quality. Approaches to Performance Review in General Practice. London: Royal Colleger of General Practitioners.
  • Perry, L. (1997). Critical Incidents, crucial issues: insights into the working lives of registered nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 6, 131-137.
  • Pringle, M. (1993). Change and Teamwork in Primary Care. London: BMJ Books.
  • Pringle, M., Bradley, C., & Carmichael, C. (1994). A survey of attitudes to and experience of medical audit in general practice. .
  • Pringle, M., & Bradley, C. (1994). Significant event auditing: a users' guide. Audit Trends, 2, 70-73.
  • Pringle, M., Bradley, C. P., Carmichael, C. M., Wallis, H., & Moore, A. (1995). Significant event auditing. A study of the feasibility and potential of case-based auditing in primary medical care. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract (BPU)(70), i-viii, 1- 71.
  • Pringle, M. (1998). Preventing ischaemic heart disease in one general practice: from one patient, through clinical audit, needs assessment, and commissioning into quality improvement. BMJ, 317, 1120-1123.
  • Pringle, M. (2000). Significant event auditing. In T. v. Zwanenburg & J. Harrison (Eds.), Clinical Governance in Primary Care . Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.
  • Qadir, N., Takrouri, M. S., Seraj, M. A., el-Dawlatly, A. A., al-Satli, R., al-Jasser, M. M., & Baaj, J. (1998). Critical incident reports. Middle East J Anesthesiol, 14(6), 425-32.
  • Ramsden, J. (1997). Objective analysis of a critical incident. Nurs Times, 93(34), 43-5.
  • RCGP. (1995). Significant event auditing (Occasional paper 70 ). Exeter: Royal College of General Practitioners.
  • Rich, A., & Parker, D. (1995). Reflecttion and critical incident analysis: ethical and moral implicataion of their use within nursing and midwifery education. Jounal of Advanced Nursing, 22, 1050-7.
  • Robinson, L. A., Stacy, R., Spencer, J. A., & Bhopal, R. S. (1995). Use of facilitated case discussions for significant event auditing. Bmj, 311(7000), 315-8.
  • Robinson L, Drinkwater C. A significant case audit of a community-based elderly resource team -- an opportunity for multidisciplinary teams to introduce clinical governance? Journal-of-Clinical-Governance, 2000; 8(2): 89-96.
  • Robling, M., Kinnersley, P., Houston, H., Hourihan, M., Cohen, D., & Hale, J. (1998). An exploration of GPs' use of MRI: a critical incident study. Fam Pract, 15(3), 236-43.
  • Roland M, Baker R. Clinical Governance : a practical guide for primary care teams. 1999.London: DOH.
  • Rolfe, G. (1997). Beyond expertise: theory, practice and the reflexsive practitioner. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 6, 93-97.
  • Rosenal, L. (1995). Exploring the Learner's World: Critical Incident Methodology. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 26, 115-118.
  • Scally, G., & Donaldson, L. (1998). Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. BMJ, 317, 61-5.
  • Schon, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. London: Jossey-Bass.
  • Scott, M., & Marinker, M. (1990). Small Group Work. In M. Marinker (Ed.), Medical Audit in General Practice . London: MSD Foundation.
  • Shaw, C. D. (1980). Aspects of audit 4. British Medical Journal, 280, 1443 - 5.
  • Sim, M., Kamien, M., & Diamond, M. (1996). From novice to proficent general practitioner:a critical incident study. Australian Family Physician, 25, 59-64.
  • Smith, A., & Russell, J. (1991). Using critical learning incidents in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 11, 284-291.
  • Smith, A., & Russell, J. (1993). Critical Incident Technique:. In J. Reed & S. Proctor (Eds.), Nurse education: A Reflective Approach . London: Edward Arnold.
  • Stead J, Sweeney G, Westcott R. Significant Event Audit- a key tool for clinical governance. Clinical Governance Bulletin 2000, 1,13-14.
  • Stromberg, A., Brostrom, A., Dahlstrom, U., & Fridlund, B. (1999). Factors influencing patient compliance with therapeutic regimens in chronic heart failure: A critical incident technique analysis. Heart Lung, 28(5), 334-41.
  • Sweeney G, Westcott R, Stead J. The benefits of significant event audit in primary care: a case study. Journal of Clinical Governance, 2000;8:128-134.
  • Teasdale, K. (1996). Using personal profiles in reflective practice. Professional Nurse, 11, 323-4.
  • Vincent, C. (Ed.). (1995). Clinical risk management. London: BMJ Publications.
  • Vincent, C. (1997). Risk, Safety ;and the dark side of quality. Available: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7097/1775 [1999, 23.12.99].
  • Vincent, C. (1998). Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. Available: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/7138/1154 [1999, 23.12.99].
  • Westcott, R., Sweeney, G., & Stead, J. (2000). Significant Event Audit in Practice: a preliminary study. Family Practice, Oxford University Press, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp 173-179.
  • Westcott R. Significant event audit. General Practice Manager Special Report. 2000; 30
  • Woolsey, L. (1986). The critical incident tecnique: an innovative qualitative method of research. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 20, 242-254.